Why
Special Services For Homeschoolers?
Because of a recent policy
change thrust upon us by the New York State Education Department (NYSED), New
York homeschoolers are confronted with a critical situation. As of January, 2008, NYSED has eliminated
special services for all special-needs homeschooled children. For the details and the actions you need to
take, please read both this article and the Call to Action.
But wait a minute; you say you
don’t have a special-needs child, so how could this possibly affect you? Or you
might say that homeschoolers have no business getting any services from the
government anyway, so why is this change a
problem? Let’s take a moment to examine
these issues.
There is substantial anecdotal
evidence that special-needs homeschool students thrive in ways that are far
beyond the expectations of professionals.
This underscores the importance of a loving, caring educational
environment (homeschooling!) on child development; an effect that is likely
intensified in children with disabilities.
However, in many cases special services and therapies are necessary in
order to enable learning and skill development in the child. These services can
be very costly because they often need to be administered by trained
professionals and can require expensive, specialized equipment.
Federal law requires that
States provide public school students with physical and learning disabilities
with the services necessary to enable them to receive an appropriate
education. Until the recent policy
change, it had been NYSED’s policy to provide special services to New York
homeschoolers on nearly the same basis.
Because the vast majority of children attend public school, it is
virtually public policy now that children who need special services in
order to learn and progress are eligible to receive them, that is, except
for homeschool children.
Some homeschool parents with
disabled children have chosen not to receive special services for which they
are eligible. However, the specialized
nature and/or cost of some needed services puts them beyond the financial
capability of parents who would otherwise choose homeschooling for the benefits
that it holds for their special-needs child.
Furthermore, it is often not even the cost that is the prohibitive
factor. Many special services are
provided to school districts by agencies under contract to that district. Often
these agencies, which may be the sole providers of certain services for a
region, do not accept private cases, i.e., they do not accept clients except
under the auspices of the school district contract. This leaves some families unable to obtain
needed services at any price. Therefore,
for New York to now require public school attendance in order to receive these
services is to effectively deny some parents the right to homeschool, which is
an otherwise valid and legal educational option. This seems especially ironic
considering the benefits that special-needs children often receive from being
schooled at home.
Thus, the net effect of this
policy change is to effectively force many parents to place their special-needs
children in the public schools so that they may receive needed services. If, as accused by some, the State is hoping
to benefit from the short-term savings by not providing services, this makes
for a rather ironic situation because it is likely to cost more to provide
these services to the child in a public school environment than in a homeschool
environment. This is because homeschool
parents often participate in providing these services under the direction of a
professional. Furthermore, by continuing
to deny needed and beneficial services to homeschool children may mean that
some of these children may not achieve a level of independence and
self-sufficiency that they would have with services, thereby exposing the State
to further costs from institutionalization and/or welfare as adults. As you can see, this is really a penny-wise
and pound-foolish policy.
The State of New York and its
school districts are already reaping a financial benefit of approximately $200
million by not having to educate the over 20,000 homeschooled students in the
state. New York shouldn’t be allowed to
try to receive even more economic benefits (despite the false economics as just
described) by denying some of its most challenged young citizens those necessary
services which are provided to nearly every other child who needs them. This is
a matter of the most basic fairness. It
is this writer’s opinion that these necessary special services should be made
available to all families who are determined to need them (and want them),
regardless of the mode of education, or the services should be provided
to no one. The State of New York should
not be able to use the provision of necessary services to effectively coerce
parents to place their special-needs children in the public school when their
real desire is to homeschool them.
In terms of the speed at which
government usually moves, NYSED made this policy change in the blink of an
eye. There was no consultation with
homeschoolers or homeschool groups, there was no
public hearing or comment; there was just a sudden and abrupt change to a
policy going back at least 17 years, in response to a recently issued, but
faulty legal opinion. NYSED has since
sought to justify its actions by saying that it only affects about 450
homeschooled students currently receiving special services. This really misses the point because those
450 students are those who may be the most at risk. It reduces the practical viability of
homeschooling for these families.
As Christians, we are called to
look out for those among us who are the weakest and most at risk. As fellow homeschoolers, we need to stand
together against the coercive power of the State. Even in a democratic society in which we are
blessed to live, the State has enormous collective and bureaucratic power which
it is able to wield against an individual or a small group thereof. (Just try
arguing with the IRS if you don’t believe me).
All homeschoolers need to take the time and effort to respond to this
action and multiply the relatively small number of special-needs homeschoolers
to be a much greater multitude in the eyes of New York. Jesus tells us that “whatever you did for one
of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for
me.” Let’s band together and support
those who need our help the most.
However, perhaps even more
critical is the importance of responding to the impropriety of how the policy
change was made. As indicated above, it
was made abruptly without consultation, public hearing or comment. For years, NYSED has been telling
homeschoolers that improvements couldn’t be made in the homeschool regulations
without extensive hearings and participation by all manner of parties. But now it seems that when it pleases them,
they can just change long-standing policies unilaterally in a heartbeat. The precedent of this policy change puts all
homeschooling rights at potential risk because our practical rights to
homeschool in New York are largely dependent upon regulation and policy, rather
than on statute and constitution.
Therefore, this policy change must not stand without
vigorous opposition, OR all homeschoolers are at risk for what NYSED might
conceive to do next. Letting this change stand without opposition will
only embolden NYSED in its future dealings with homeschoolers. Today it is the special-needs homeschoolers,
a relatively small minority; but what or who will it be
tomorrow? If you don’t have a special
needs child, or if you don’t even know of one, I ask you to contemplate the
words of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, German pastor during
WW2: “First they came for the
Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came
for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists, but I was neither, so I did not
speak out. Then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not speak
out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.”
Therefore,
the entire
Copyright © 2008 LEAH, Inc. All
Rights Reserved